登录/注册后可看大图
羡慕你
[size=+4]Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR
[size=+3]World's Sharpest Ultrawide Zoom
[size=+3]FX, $1,160 (2010-)
2010 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved.
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
Nikon 16-35mm f/4 AF-S VR G ED IF N Aspherical (77mm filters, 23.9 oz./678g). enlarge. I'd get it at Adorama or Amazon. It helps me keep adding this site when you get yours from these links, thanks! Ken.
April 2010 More Nikon Reviews
NEW: Nikon Ultrawide Zooms Compared 08 March 2010
Nikon 16-35mm © sample image file at ISO 1,100
Nikon 16-35mm © sample image file at ISO 1,000
[size=+3]Introduction top
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
B&H Photo - Video - Pro Audio [size=-1]I personally suggest Adorama, Amazon, Ritz, B&H, Calumet [size=-1]and J&R. I can't vouch for ads below. |
The Nikon 16-35mm VR is the sharpest ultrawide zoom I've ever used. Under test conditions, it's even slightly sharper than the old king, the beastly Nikon 14-24mm.
This Nikon 16-35mm is so good that there isn't much to write about. It's ultra-sharp, it has no significant light falloff in the corners, distortion is reasonable from 20-35mm, focus and zooming are easy and perfect, and it focuses to within just inches in front of the lens.
The 16-35mm's weakest points are its heinous, but easy-to-correct, distortion at 16mm, and it's giant size; five inches (125mm) long. Nikon's first ultrawide zoom, the 20-35mm f/2.8 AF-D (1993-2001), is a stop faster, built pro-tough (unlike this 16-35mm), and is still smaller and lighter, but the 20-35mm has nowhere near the optical performance of this new 16-35mm f/4.
The 16-35mm is Nikon's newest ultrawide zoom. It covers the full FX frame for use with both FX and 35mm RealRaw cameras.
The 16-35mm VR is also Nikon's widest FX lens ever that works with front-mounted filters. The older 15mm f/3.5, 15mm f/5.6, 14mm f/2.8 AF-D and 13mm f/5.6 had such bulbous fronts that no filter could cover them. The front element of this Nikon 16-35mm lens is tiny by comparison.
This new 16-35mm is a huge step up from the 14-24mm because it's much smaller and lighter, has a much more useful zoom range, takes filters both for protection and for use with RealRaw, and is even a little sharper. There's no question that it's time to sell your 14-24mm and get this smaller, lighter and far more practical 16-35mm instead.
VR isn't a big deal. It only gets a stop or two of improvement for hand-held low-light shots of still subjects, which makes it about even with an f/2.8 lens. I do prefer shooting at f/4 with VR over f/2.8 without VR for depth-of-field, but for low light wide angle shots, nothing today compares with the new Nikon 24mm f/1.4 AF-S.
Compared to the hard-to-get professional 17-35mm f/2.8, this 16-35mm VR is $500 less expensive and otherwise similar in size and weight. This 16-35mm VR is however a little lighter, a little longer, and it's sharper if you're picky.
This 16-35mm f/4 VR just became my top recommendation for an FX ultrawide zoom.
Bravo, Nikon!
[size=+1]Compatibility
Nikon 16-35mm VR. enlarge.
[size=+2][size=+3]Specifications top
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
Nikon 16-35mm Alphabet Soup. enlarge.
[size=+1]Name
Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR N.
Nano Crystal Coat (N): Magic anti-reflection coating that has a variable index of refraction that's far more effective than multicoating.
AF-S and SWM: Silent Wave Autofocus Motor.
VR: Vibration Reduction.
ED: Magic ED Glass.
G: Gelded for cost-reduction and removing compatibility with older cameras.
IF: Internal focusing; nothing moves externally as focused.
Aspherical (ASPH): Specially curved glass to give even sharper pictures.
∅77: 77mm filter thread.
[size=+1]Optics
17 elements in 12 groups.
Two are of magic ED glass.
Three are aspherical.
Nano Crystal Coat is used on at least one surface, so ghosting should be minimal to nonexistent.
[size=+1]Format Coverage
Also works great on DX, although the 18-55mm VR, 16-85mm VR or 10-24mm make much more sense on DX.
[size=+1]Focal Length
Actual focal length: 16-35mm.Equivalent on on FX and RealRaw: 16-35mm.
Equivalent on small-format DX: 24-50mm.
[size=+1]Angle of View
107° - 63° on FX and RealRaw.
83° - 44° on small-format DX.
[size=+1]Diaphragm
Nikon 16-35mm VR at f/22. enlarge.
9 rounded blades.
Stops down to f/22.
[size=+1]Filter Thread
77mm, plastic.
Does not move or rotate.
[size=+1]Close Focus
1 foot (0.29m), specified, from the image plane. I measure about 11" (280mm).
The image plane is at the back of your camera. You can focus much closer to the front of the lens.
[size=+1]Working Distance
Close focus is 11 or 12 inches from the image plane, however, the 16-35mm is five inches (125mm) long and your camera is typically 2 inches (50mm) deep, this means that close focus is just a few inches in front of your lens!
I can focus up to just 4 inches (100mm) from the front of the lens. If I used the included lens hood, there would be even less space between that hood and the closest subject on which I could focus.
[size=+1]Maximum Reproduction Ratio
1:4.
[size=+1]Hard Infinity Focus Stop?
No.
[size=+1]Focus Scale
Yes.
[size=+1]Depth-of-Field Scale
No.
[size=+1]Infra-Red Focus Index
No.
[size=+1]Vibration Reduction (VR)
Trade name "VR II."
Claimed improvement: "up to 4 stops."
Actual improvement: one or two stops.
Nikon 16-35mm VR. enlarge.
[size=+1]Hood
HB-23 plastic bayonet hood, included.
This is the same hood as the 10-24mm DX, 12-24mm DX, 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S and 18-35mm AF-D.
[size=+1]Case
CL-1120 pouch, included.
[size=+1]Size
3.25" diameter x 4.92" extension from flange.
82.5 mm diameter x 125 mm extension from flange.
[size=+1]Weight
23.912 oz. (677.9g), measured.
24.0 oz. (680g), rated.
[size=+1]Included
Front and rear caps (LC-77 and LF-1)
HB-23 plastic bayonet hood.
CL-1120 pouch.
[size=+1]Nikon Product Number
2182.
[size=+1]Made in
Japan, at least the early sample seen here.
Nikon sometimes moves production to Thailand (18-200mm) or China (50mm) as a lens gets older.
[size=+1]Announced
09 February 2010.
[size=+1]Available
Since March 2010.
[size=+1]Price
$1,160, USA, July 2010.
$1,200, USA, June 2010.
$1,250, USA, April 2010.
$1,260, USA, March 2010.
[size=+1]Packaging
Cardboard box.
Top holds a cardboard insert with the hood and lens pouch.
Bottom 2/3 of box holds lens between two white foam holders.
Paperwork slid in along the side.
Box, Nikon 16-35mm VR. enlarge.
[size=+2][size=+3]Performance top
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
Overall Focus Bokeh Distortion Ergonomics Falloff
Filters Flash Ghosts Lateral Color Fringes Macro
Mechanics Sharpness Sunstars Survivability VR Zooming
[size=+2]Overall performance top
Performance is superb.
This Nikon 16-35mm is ultra-sharp, has no significant light falloff, focus and zooming are perfect, and it focuses way too close.
[size=+2]Focus performance top
Focus is always fast and sure.
Typical for Nikon, every shot is right-on.
There are no surprises here.
It's trivial to go from auto to manual focus: just grab the focus ring for manual, and tap the shutter again to get back to auto.
The focus ring only turns if you turn it.
M/A - M Switch
Nikon goofed. This switch should be labeled "A - M."
The "M/A" position means autofocus. It's called "M/A" because you also can focus manually simply by grabbing the focus ring in this position.
Paint over the extra M if you're easily confused.
Focus Drift
Focus holds while zooming.
The sample of lens I use is well enough constructed that you can zoom after focusing, and it stays in focus.
It doesn't drift as zoomed.
[size=+2]Bokeh performance top
With a lens this wide and slow, almost nothing is out of focus.
If you can get a background out of focus, bokeh (the softness of the out-of-focus area) is excellent. Backgrounds never distract.
[size=+2]Distortion performance top
Distortion (curving of straight lines) is heinous at 16mm.
In fact, the Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR, when set to 16mm, is the most distorting lens I have every used, short of a deliberate fisheye. The distortion goes away at other zoom settings.
Thankfully the distortion is simple and very easy to correct in Photoshop's lens distortion filter, so no big deal.
This distortion is usually completely invisible. If you're the sort of Poindexter who spends more time trolling the Internet looking for flaws than shooting, this lens will keep you busy whining for some time.
Here's how invisible it usually is:
Lucille's, 16mm at f/4, 1/15 sec. original © file.
Since no lines run parallel to the edges of the frame and are close to the edges, there's nothing distorted.
OC Swap Meet at 16mm. bigger.
In this shot of a fence, few if any of the lines are parallel to, or near, the edges, so again, distortion is largely invisible.
If I shoot something with a straight line parallel and near an edge, it can look as bad as this:
Cage Nest at 16mm. bigger.
See the curving of the line along the top and the crack in the stick-on vinyl tiles below? That's how the distortion looks, worst case.
Plug +8 into Photoshop's lens distortion filter, and bingo, problem goes away:
Cage Nest at 16mm. bigger.
Not bad at all, considering it's shot wide-open at f/4.
FX at 10' (3m) | FX at infinity | |
16mm | +8.0* !!! | +8.4 !!! |
20mm | +3.0 | +3.0 |
24mm | 0.0 | 0.0 |
28mm | -1.0 | -1.0 |
31mm | -1.5 | |
35mm | -2.0 | -2.0 |
[size=-2]© 2010 KenRockwell.com
* Some waviness remains.
Here are snaps of the horizon at Corallina Cove, 18 June 2010, 3PM, on FX full-frame:
Here are brick walls for you Poindexters, also shot on full-frame. I moved away as I zoomed-in to keep the bricks about the same size, and shot this freehand as the wife and baby kept on moving at the swap meet:
[size=+2]Ergonomics performance top
Nikon 16-35mm VR. enlarge.
Ergonomics are excellent, except that it's too long (5" or 125mm) and too heavy.
It's longer than the 18-200mm and only 1/2" (12mm) shorter than the 70-300mm VR.
It is significantly bigger and heavier than the 70-300mm G or 200mm f/4 AI-s.
It's so long that it's always banging into things. I need to treat this lens as if it's a telephoto.
[size=+2]Falloff (darker corners) performance top
Falloff is negligible. It's invisible, even at its worst, in actual photography.
I can greatly exaggerate it by shooting flat fields and then reproducing them here against another flat field, and falloff is still minor.
Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR falloff on FX and film at infinity.
[size=-2]© 2010 KenRockwell.com. All rights reserved. |
[size=+2]Filters, Use with performance top
[size=+2]Flash, Use with performance top
If used on a D3 with an SB-400 flash, you'll see a dark shadow in the middle of the bottom of the image when set to wider than 21mm.
Bigger flashes should cause no problem, and built-in flashes should be worse.
Used indoors, I get swell coverage with the SB-400. Even though I'd get light falloff is shooting directly at walls, I don't do that. When I shoot with a wide lens indoors, the walls, floor and ceiling are much closer to me at the sides of the image, and the light falloff from the flash thus corrects itself.
[size=+2]Lateral Color Fringes performance top
[size=+2]Macro performance top
Rockwell's watch on FX. This would be even tighter on a DX camera.
It gets to one-quarter life-size, on-sensor, which is this close on FX.
It's a wide lens, which is funny because its making my watch look bigger (closer) and my wrists look smaller (father away).
[size=+2]Mechanics and Construction performance top
My Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR has a plastic exterior. It feels and sounds exactly like the material with which the 24-120mm VR and 18-200mm VR are clad.
It is completely different from the metal alloy with which the exteriors of the 24-70mm f/2.8 AFS, 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S and most of the the 14-24mm are clad.
I'm not reading this off the internet; I'm looking at all of these lenses sitting right here in front of me.
Nikon has claimed that the 16-35mm has a magnesium alloy barrel, but Nikon's PR is either mistaken, or referring to the interior, not exterior, barrel.
Either I have a special one-of-a-kind collectable plastic version, or they all have plastic exteriors.
The interior is a different matter, and there seems to be plenty of metal inside, but not on the outside. You folks shooting outdoors in Norway should appreciate this.
My only whine about plastic is that the markings eventually wear off. Plastic weighs less than metal, so plastic on the outside is good. Plastic bounces when dropped; it doesn't stay bent and bung up the action. Filter threads are better in metal (they are plastic on the 16-35mm), but otherwise, plastic outer cases are fine in my book.
Good lenses, like manual-focus lenses, have only one barrel, but AF lenses have inner and outer barrels. The outside of a modern AF lens is just a dust jacket and rarely structural.
If you want your gear built like a tank, shoot the D3X, the 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S, the 24-70mm f/2.8 AFS, the 50mm f/1.2 AI-s and the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II. The less expensive gear is made of plastic because it weighs less and saves money. If you want tough, Nikon still delivers in its pro gear.
The Nikon 16-35mm f/4VR is built to solid amateur standards, the same standards as the 18-200mm VR and 24-120mm VR.
Barrel Exterior: Plastic.
Filter Threads: Plastic.
Hood: Plastic bayonet.
Focus Ring: Plastic; rubber covered.
Zoom Ring: Solid plastic.
Depth-of-Field Scale: None.
Internals and zoom cams: Metal.
Aperture Ring: None.
Mount: Dull-chromed brass.
Markings: Paint.
Identity Plate: Embossed and planed metal.
Serial Number: Laser engraved onto bottom rear of barrel, near mount.
US versions delineated by: "US" prefix to serial number.
Ass-Gasket (dust seal at mount): Yes.
Noises When Shaken: Moderate klunking from the optics wiggling around.
Made in: Japan.
Weaknesses: None observed; a tough lens albeit with a plastic skin.
[size=+2]Sharpness performance top
To my pleasant surprise, this Nikon 16-35mm VR is the sharpest wide zoom I've ever used, from anyone. It is sharper than the former world standard, the old 14-24mm AFS from 2007.
If you're counting pixels, this new 16-35mm VR is significantly sharper on digital than any of the older 18-35mm, 20-35mm f/2.8 or 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S. The improvement over the 14-24mm is subtle; the 14-24mm is also a very sharp lens.
Sorry Canon, but neither the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 L II, 16-35mm f/2.8 L or 17-40mm f/4 L can compare either, if you're looking closely.
Lucille's, 16mm at f/4, 1/15 sec, ISO 1,100. original © file.
When looking at the original file for the snap above, recognize that depth-of field at f/4 and the camera's noise reduction at ISO 1,100 is what's limiting sharpness, not the lens. My D3, just like a drunk driver, focused on the pole in the middle, so most of the background isn't in focus.
Lucille's, 16mm at f/4, 1/15 sec, ISO 1,000. original © file.
The top and bottom left corners of the original file might look a little softer at 100%, but remember that these parts of the subject are closer and not in focus at f/4 as shot. Don't let the huge depth of field at f/4 and 16mm make you expect that everything is in focus, even at huge enlargements.
Except for the 14-24mm, there is no other Nikon ultrawide lens that can make images this sharp and contrasty wide-open, all the way out to the corners.
The worst I can say is that the far corners in FX get slightly less contrasty at f/4 compared to other apertures, but even that is minor. Even at f/4, it's as sharp as it can get.
If you're just taking great pictures, the sharpness difference doesn't matter, and you should be guided by size, weight and price, at which point, the 18-35mm is about as good at half the price with half the weight.
[size=+2]Sunstars performance top
With its 9-bladed diaphragm, this 16-35mm makes subtly magnificent 18-pointed sunstars on bright points of light.
Since it's using rounded instead of straight blades it's usually very subtle.
The 16-35mm actually stops down its diaphragm at f/4 at 16mm, so if you look at this original file, you can see the stars on some of the brightest points of light, even at f/4.
[size=+2]Survivability performance top
[size=+2]Vibration Reduction (VR or Image stabilization) top
Turn VR off in daylight, since it increases shutter delay.
2s | 1 | 1/2 | 1/4 | 1/8 | 1/15 | |
16mm | 0 | 17 | 40 | 92 | 83 | 100 |
24mm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 83 | 100 |
35mm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 33 | 83 |
Percent perfectly sharp shots, Nikon D3 with VR ON
2s | 1 | 1/2 | 1/4 | 1/8 | 1/15 | |
16mm | 0 | 67 | 67 | 100 | 90 | 100 |
24mm | 5 | 33 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
35mm | 0 | 40 | 40 | 100 | 83 | 83 |
"Real Stops Improvement" are how many extra stops I got, IS ON compared to IS OFF.
"Marketing Stops Improvement" isn't comparing the speed I can use from IS OFF to IS ON, but instead comparing the speed one can use with IS ON to the old-wives-tale speed of 1/focal length. That's called Lying with Statistics.
| [size=+1] | No VR | VR ON | Marketing Stops Improvement | Real | [size=+1]Effective Speed |
[size=+1]16mm | 1/2.5 | 1.2s | 4.3 | 1.6 | [size=+1]f/2.2 |
[size=+1]24mm | 1/4 | 1/1.6 | 4 | 1.3 | [size=+1]f/2.5 |
[size=+1]35mm | 1/12 | 1/2.5 | 3.8 | 2.3 | [size=+1]f/1.8 |
It's easy to get sharp shots at 1/4 to 1/2 second at every focal length with VR ON, but then again, I get the same results at 1/5 - 1/15 with no VR.
The benefit of VR is only visible between 1/8 and 1 second, which is very useful for dim light. In dim light, getting an average of 1-2/3 stops of VR benefit in exchange for 1 stop lost compared to an f/2.8 lens is a winner for still subjects, since not only am I 2/3 stop ahead, the smaller aperture gives more depth-of-field as well.
[size=+2]Zooming performance top
Zoom Ring, Nikon 16-35mm.
Focus doesn't shift as zoomed. It stays as set.
[size=+2][size=+3]Compared top
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
See Nikon Ultrawide Zooms Compared.
[size=+2][size=+3]Recommendations top
Intro Specs Performance Compared Recommendations
If you shoot FX, or RealRaw on a modern camera, get one of these 16-35mm lenses today.
Turn VR off in daylight, since it increases shutter delay.
If distortion bothers you, avoid the 16mm setting, or simply correct it in Photoshop.
For low-light, use the 35mm f/1.8 on DX, or the 50mm f/1.4 or 24mm f1.4 on FX, any of which is superior in dim light.
Skip this 16-35mm for DX; the 18-55mm VR DX does pretty much the same thing for a lot less money, size and weight. The 10-24mm DX also does the same thing, but better, also for less money, on DX.
Forget this 16-35mm G for manual-focus Nikon cameras. It's useless because Nikon gelded it. Use the 17-35mm f/2.8 instead.
If you already own the professional 17-35mm f/2.8, don't get too excited about this 16-35mm. This 16-35mm is sharper and lighter weight, but built to an amateur level mechanically and a stop slower. It's a toss-up.
If you're a backpacker, the 18-35mm AF-D or 20mm f/2.8 AF-D weighs and costs half as much, and does the same thing.
If you're a cheapskate and/or appreciate professional build quality, the 20-35mm f/2.8 AF-D does the same thing, with smaller size, less weight and it's built to professional levels. The 20-35mm skips the alphabet BS convenience features like VR, AFS and stupid-wide 16mm to deliver pro-quality optics in a pro-built lens for half the price (used).
This said, for most of us reading this, this 16-35mm is the sharpest and best-handling ultrawide zoom ever made. Get the 17-35mm f/2.8 if you need solid metal or f/2.8, otherwise, I'm going to grab this 16-35mm long before I'd use the heavier 17-35mm again.
The huge 14-24mm is a special-purpose lens. I don't suggest it for general use; I suggest this 16-35mm.
[size=+1]Deployment
I never use the hood.
I'd leave either a 77mm Nikon Clear (NC - UV) filter, or a 77mm Hoya Super HMC UV on the lens at all times. I would leave the hood at home.
If I was working in nasty, dirty areas, I'd forget the cap, and use an uncoated 77mm Tiffen UV filter instead. Uncoated filters are much easier to clean, but more prone to ghosting.
For color slides like Velvia 50, I use a 77mm Nikon A2 or 77mm Hoya HMC 81A outdoors.
For B&W film outdoors, I'd use a 77mm Nikon Y48 or O56 filter, or 77mm Hoya HMC K2 or 77mm Hoya HMC Orange.
[size=+1]More Information
多拍~
），只有一个广角方便但有时会很吃力
当然，变形是需要适度的，变形与画面和场景有机结合后才能有冲击力，过度的变形则是过犹不及。| 欢迎光临 骑友网|单车论坛|骑行网|自行车之家 (http://51bike.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.4 |
